What Is to Be Done? · Chapter
III: Viéra Pavlovna’s Second Dream explained
In her second dream, Viéra Pavlovna engages in a philosophical discussion about 'actual' versus 'fantastic' dirt, symbolizing the conditions for healthy growth and life.
What happens
In her second dream, Viéra Pavlovna engages in a philosophical discussion about 'actual' versus 'fantastic' dirt, symbolizing the conditions for healthy growth and life. The dream shifts to a game of 'Confession' where characters reveal their backgrounds, highlighting the contrast between genuine hardship and artificial concerns. Marya Alekséyevna appears and defends her harsh upbringing, conjuring a vision of an alternative life to justify her actions.
Themes in this chapter
Critique of Bourgeois Society
Contrasts genuine human needs (actual dirt) with artificial concerns (fantastic dirt), critiquing the superficiality of bourgeois life.
Freedom and Individuality
Viéra Pavlovna's desire for meaningful conversation and play reflects a quest for personal autonomy.
Characters to notice
- Viéra Pavlovna
Dreams and participates in the game of Confession, expressing frustration with abstract discussions.
- Marya Alekséyevna
Appears in the dream to defend her actions and conjure a vision of an alternative life.
- Dmitri Sergéitch Lopukhóf
Present as 'mílenki' and engages in the philosophical discussion about dirt and reality.
- Alekséi Petróvitch
Leads the game of Confession and explains the concepts of actual and fantastic dirt.
- Serge
Attempts to confess but is dismissed for his superficial concerns.
Key passages
“Motion is reality, because motion is life; and reality and life are one and the same thing. But the main element of life is labor, and therefore, the main element of reality is labor, and the truest sign of reality is activity.”
Movement defines reality, as it is synonymous with life; labor is the core of life, making activity the most genuine indicator of reality.
Alekséi Petróvitch articulates the materialist philosophy underlying the dream's symbolism.
“I am good for escorting Julie everywhere that she wants me to go. I help Julie to spend all the money she wants to spend.”
My only purpose is to accompany Julie wherever she wishes and assist her in spending her money.
Serge admits his lack of meaningful purpose, illustrating the emptiness of a parasitic existence.