The Innocents Abroad · Chapter
The Buried City of Pompeii explained
The narrator explores the excavated ruins of Pompeii, reflecting on the preserved streets, houses, and artifacts that reveal daily life in the ancient city.
What happens
The narrator explores the excavated ruins of Pompeii, reflecting on the preserved streets, houses, and artifacts that reveal daily life in the ancient city. He contrasts the permanence of stone with the fleeting nature of fame, and muses on the tragic fate of the city's inhabitants during the volcanic eruption.
Themes in this chapter
The Past vs. the Present
The narrator contrasts the vibrant life of ancient Pompeii with its current state as a silent, sunlit ruin, and reflects on the ephemeral nature of fame across centuries.
Satire of Tourism
The narrator humorously imagines modern tourist elements like street boys and theater performances, and criticizes the neglect of street maintenance by ancient officials.
Characters to notice
- The Narrator
The narrator guides the reader through Pompeii, offering observations and reflections on the ruins and the passage of time.
Key passages
“Fully one-half of the buried city, perhaps, is completely exhumed and thrown open freely to the light of day; and there stand the long rows of solidly-built brick houses (roofless) just as they stood eighteen hundred years ago, hot with the flaming sun;”
About half of Pompeii has been fully excavated and is now open to the sun, with rows of roofless brick houses still standing as they did 1,800 years ago.
Describes the state of the ruins and the extent of excavation.
“I saw the skeletons of a man, a woman, and two young girls. The woman had her hands spread wide apart, as if in mortal terror, and I imagined I could still trace upon her shapeless face something of the”
I saw the skeletons of a man, a woman, and two young girls; the woman's hands were outstretched as if in terror, and I thought I could still see fear on her face.
The narrator observes preserved skeletons, imagining their final moments.
“What may be left of General Grant’s great name forty centuries hence? This—in the Encyclopedia for AD 5868, possibly: “ Uriah S. (or Z. ) Graunt —popular poet of ancient times in the Aztec provinces of the United States of British America.”
What will remain of General Grant's fame in 4,000 years? Perhaps a garbled encyclopedia entry misidentifying him as a poet from a fictional future nation.
Reflects on the impermanence of fame, using Grant as an example.