All chapters

Saint Joan · Chapter

The Law of Change Is the Law of God explained

This chapter argues that the law of evolution and change is fundamental to divine law, using Joan of Arc as an example of a self-selected saint who represents the unaveraged individual against institutional hierarchies.

What happens

This chapter argues that the law of evolution and change is fundamental to divine law, using Joan of Arc as an example of a self-selected saint who represents the unaveraged individual against institutional hierarchies. It critiques the Church's democratic selection process for producing mediocrity rather than sanctity, and contends that heresy and misconduct are often the first appearances of progress, making tolerance essential for improvement.

Themes in this chapter

  • Heresy and Sanctity

    Explores how all evolution in thought and conduct first appears as heresy, using Joan as a prime example of a self-selected saint challenging institutional norms.

  • Individual vs. Institution

    Contrasts the unaveraged individual (like Joan) with the official organization of the Church, arguing that institutions cannot compete with the direct choice of the Holy Ghost.

Characters to notice

  • Joan of Arc

    Cited as a self-selected saint who maintained her own ways, representing the unaveraged individual against the Church's hierarchical average.

  • Christ

    Referenced as the Word made Flesh, representing the individual beyond the mathematical average of God and Church.

Key passages

  • The law of God is a law of evolution, and ... when the Churches set themselves against change as such, they are setting themselves against the law of God.

    Divine law is inherently progressive, so when religious institutions oppose change, they oppose God's will.

    Central thesis linking divine law to evolutionary change.

  • all evolution in thought and conduct must at first appear as heresy and misconduct.

    Every advance in ideas and behavior initially looks like heresy or wrongdoing.

    Key argument for tolerating heresy as a driver of progress.