Saint Joan · Chapter
Comparative Fairness of Joan’s Trial explained
This chapter examines the fairness of Joan of Arc's trial, arguing that Cauchon was actually threatened by the English for being too lenient.
What happens
This chapter examines the fairness of Joan of Arc's trial, arguing that Cauchon was actually threatened by the English for being too lenient. It compares the trial to modern examples like Edith Cavell, noting that political partisanship and lack of neutral tribunals are unavoidable flaws. The chapter concludes that Joan's persecution would be similar today, with changes only in method, not in intolerance.
Themes in this chapter
Justice and Injustice
The chapter explores the inherent unfairness of politically partisan trials and the lack of neutral tribunals.
Heresy and Sanctity
Joan and Edith Cavell are both described as arch heretics, persecuted for crossing societal lines.
Nationalism and Patriotism
Edith Cavell's rejection of patriotism as insufficient is contrasted with nationalistic reactions to her execution.
Characters to notice
- Joan of Arc
The subject of the trial; her persecution is compared to modern cases.
- Peter Cauchon
Threatened and insulted by the English for being too considerate to Joan.
- Edith Cavell
Modern example of a heretic executed by military tribunal; her statement 'Patriotism is not enough' is cited.
Key passages
“The truth is that Cauchon was threatened and insulted by the English for being too considerate to Joan.”
Cauchon faced threats and insults from the English because he treated Joan too leniently.
Highlights the political pressure on the judge.
“Patriotism is not enough.”
Loyalty to one's country is insufficient as a moral guide.
Edith Cavell's statement, central to the comparison of intolerance.