Discourses on Livy · Chapter
XXII explained
Machiavelli examines the combat between the three Roman Horatii and the three Alban Curiatii, drawing three key lessons: never risk all fortunes on a part of one's forces, never let merit balance crime in a well-governed state, and never ma
What happens
Machiavelli examines the combat between the three Roman Horatii and the three Alban Curiatii, drawing three key lessons: never risk all fortunes on a part of one's forces, never let merit balance crime in a well-governed state, and never make covenants that cannot or should not be expected to be observed. He notes that the Alban king Metius quickly regretted his surrender and later sought to betray Rome, illustrating the folly of such agreements.
Themes in this chapter
Necessity and Reason of State
The folly of risking the entire state on a small part of its forces and the unreliability of covenants under duress.
Leadership and Moral Character
The tension between merit and crime, as seen in Horatius's acquittal despite killing his sister.
Characters to notice
- Tullus Hostilius
King of Rome who agreed to the combat between the Horatii and Curiatii.
- Horatius Cocles
Surviving Roman champion who killed his sister for mourning her husband, a Curiatius.
Key passages
“we should never peril our whole fortunes on the success of only a part of our forces.”
Never stake everything on a small fraction of your military strength.
Machiavelli's first lesson from the combat.
“in a well-governed state, merit should never be allowed to balance crime.”
In a properly run republic, past achievements should not excuse wrongdoing.
Second lesson, highlighting the importance of justice over personal glory.
“those are never wise covenants which we cannot or should not expect to be observed.”
Agreements that are impossible or unreasonable to keep are unwise to make.
Third lesson, illustrated by Metius's subsequent betrayal.