Discourses on Livy · Chapter
XLIV explained
The chapter examines the helplessness of a multitude without a leader, using the Roman commons' retreat to the Sacred Hill as an example.
What happens
The chapter examines the helplessness of a multitude without a leader, using the Roman commons' retreat to the Sacred Hill as an example. It also warns against combining a request with a threat, as seen when the commons demanded the decemvirs be burned alive while asking for Valerius and Horatius's mediation.
Themes in this chapter
Leadership and Moral Character
The multitude's helplessness without a head highlights the necessity of leadership for collective action.
Necessity and Reason of State
The advice to conceal intentions and not to threaten while asking reflects prudence in political negotiation.
Characters to notice
- Titus Livius
Quoted regarding the commons' inability to reply without a leader.
- Valerius Corvinus
Sent to negotiate with the commons; rejected the demand to burn the decemvirs alive.
- Appius Claudius
Implied as one of the decemvirs whose office was to be laid down before negotiations.
Key passages
“Not that they were at a loss what to answer, but because they had none to answer for them;”
The commons knew what to say but had no leader to speak for them.
Illustrates the helplessness of a leaderless multitude.
“they were rushing into that very cruelty which they themselves had condemned in others;”
The commons were about to commit the same cruelty they had criticized in others.
Valerius and Horatius's rebuke against demanding the decemvirs be burned alive.