Women in Love · Chapter
A Chair explained
Ursula and Birkin debate the value of possessions and the past, ultimately deciding to give away a newly purchased chair to a young working-class couple.
What happens
Ursula and Birkin debate the value of possessions and the past, ultimately deciding to give away a newly purchased chair to a young working-class couple. Their conversation shifts to their relationship, marriage, and Birkin's desire for a broader human connection beyond just the two of them.
Themes in this chapter
Individual vs. Society
Ursula and Birkin reject societal norms of home and possessions, seeking a life uncontained by material or social expectations.
Human Connection and Isolation
Birkin's yearning for a deeper fellowship beyond his bond with Ursula highlights the tension between intimate connection and broader human relationships.
Art, Sensibility, and the Artist
The discussion of beauty, the old chair, and leaving things 'sketchy' reflects artistic sensibilities and the rejection of conventional aesthetics.
Characters to notice
- Ursula Brangwen
Rebels against the past and old beauty, insists on living without fixed possessions, and confronts Birkin about his need for others.
- Rupert Birkin
Argues against materialism and fixed homes, expresses desire for a 'further fellowship' beyond his relationship with Ursula, and engages with the young working-class man.
- Gerald Crich
Mentioned by Ursula and Birkin in the context of their desire for connection and the limits of their influence on him.
- Gudrun Brangwen
Mentioned alongside Gerald as part of the broader social circle Birkin wishes to include.
Key passages
“The truth is, we don't want things at all. The thought of a house and furniture of my own is hateful to me.”
Birkin declares that he and Ursula fundamentally reject owning possessions, finding the idea of a home with furniture repulsive.
Captures the core anti-materialist stance of the chapter.
“I want to be disinherited.”
Ursula expresses a desire to be free from any inheritance or material ties.
Highlights her rejection of the past and material legacy.
“Why should you hanker after other people? Why should you need them?”
Ursula questions Birkin's persistent need for a wider circle of intimate relationships beyond their own.
Central to the conflict about human connection in the chapter.