What’s Wrong with the World · Chapter
XI: The Queen and the Suffragettes explained
Chesterton argues that women's power is historically persuasive and personal, not coercive and collective.
What happens
Chesterton argues that women's power is historically persuasive and personal, not coercive and collective. He contends that giving women the vote (democratic power) is less fitting than granting them despotic, personal authority, as seen in queens like Victoria and Elizabeth. He warns that a herd of women in democratic power would be a nightmare, whereas individual female rulers can be sublime.
Themes in this chapter
Gender Roles and Wisdom
Chesterton argues that women's proper power is persuasive and personal, not coercive and collective, and that democratic voting endangers feminine nature.
Tradition vs. Progress
He defends the historic tradition of female rulers (queens) against the modern progressive demand for women's suffrage.
Characters to notice
- Queen Victoria
Cited as a popular queen who would have been more satisfying if she had never signed a death warrant.
- Queen Elizabeth
Mentioned as 'Bloody Bess' for her coercive actions, contrasting with the ideal of persuasive female power.
- Miss Pankhurst
Used as an example: Chesterton argues she should have a throne (despotic power) rather than a vote (democratic power).
- Suffragettes
Referenced collectively as a potential 'nightmare' or 'Witches’ Sabbath' in a democratic herd.
Key passages
“I think Queen Victoria would have been yet more popular and satisfying if she had never signed a death warrant.”
Chesterton suggests that Queen Victoria's image would have been even better if she had avoided any act of coercion, like signing a death warrant.
Illustrates the ideal of non-coercive female power.
“There is a much stronger historic argument for giving Miss Pankhurst a throne than for giving her a vote.”
Chesterton claims that history supports granting Miss Pankhurst autocratic rule rather than democratic voting rights.
Central argument of the chapter: personal despotic power is more fitting for women than collective democratic power.
“For in all legends men have thought of women as sublime separately but horrible in a herd.”
Chesterton asserts that mythology portrays individual women as magnificent, but women in a group as terrifying.
Conclusion warning against women's collective political action.