Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus · Chapter
3.261 explained
Wittgenstein distinguishes between primitive signs and defined signs, arguing that definitions reveal the meaning of defined signs through the primitive signs that compose them.
What happens
Wittgenstein distinguishes between primitive signs and defined signs, arguing that definitions reveal the meaning of defined signs through the primitive signs that compose them. He asserts that names and other independently meaningful signs cannot be broken down by definition.
Themes in this chapter
Logical Atomism
The distinction between primitive signs and defined signs reflects the atomistic view that complex expressions are built from simple, unanalyzable elements.
Limits of Language and Thought
The discussion of what can and cannot be defined highlights the boundaries of meaningful expression.
Characters to notice
- Mr. Wittgenstein
Author of the Tractatus, presenting the distinction between primitive and defined signs.
Key passages
“Every defined sign signifies via those signs by which it is defined, and the definitions show the way.”
A sign that is defined gets its meaning from the signs used to define it, and the definition itself reveals how this meaning is derived.
Clarifies the dependency of defined signs on primitive signs.
“Names cannot be taken to pieces by definition (nor any sign which alone and independently has a meaning).”
Names and other independently meaningful signs cannot be broken down or analyzed through definition.
Emphasizes the indivisibility of primitive signs.