All chapters

The Red and the Black · Chapter

Chapter XXVI. The World, Or What The Rich Lack explained

Julien Sorel, now at the seminary, observes his fellow seminarians with a mixture of contempt and pity.

What happens

Julien Sorel, now at the seminary, observes his fellow seminarians with a mixture of contempt and pity. He realizes that their piety is often a means to secure material comforts, and he struggles to adopt the outward signs of devoutness while maintaining his inner ambitions. His choice of Abbé Pirard as confessor marks a decisive step, and he becomes aware of the political and personal rivalries within the seminary, particularly between Pirard and Castanède.

Themes in this chapter

  • Hypocrisy and Social Mobility

    Julien's calculated adoption of pious behavior to advance his ambitions, and the seminarians' respect for wealth and power.

  • Class and Aristocratic Prejudice

    The seminarians' deference to 'big men' and the government, reflecting the class hierarchy in provincial France.

  • Religion as Institution

    The seminary as a place of careerism and political maneuvering rather than genuine faith.

Characters to notice

  • Julien Sorel

    Julien navigates the seminary's social dynamics, feeling isolated and striving to perfect his hypocrisy.

  • Abbé Pirard

    Pirard confronts Julien about the playing card and later becomes his chosen confessor, despite being suspected of Jansenism.

  • Abbé Castanède

    Castanède is the sub-director and Pirard's enemy, whose spies stole Julien's address.

  • Chazel

    A seminarian with real talent, but he and Julien feel mutually unsympathetic.

Key passages

  • What can one gain, they would often repeat among themselves, by having a law suit with 'a big man?'

    The seminarians believe it is futile to challenge the wealthy, as they hold all the power.

    Illustrates the class deference and pragmatism of the peasants.

  • Alas, it is my only weapon, he said to himself. At another period I should have earned my livelihood by eloquent deeds in the face of the enemy.

    Julien laments that hypocrisy is his only tool in this era, whereas in Napoleon's time he could have achieved glory through action.

    Reflects Julien's internal conflict and his romanticized view of the past.