All chapters

The Pothunters · Chapter

Mr. Roberts Explains explained

Inspector Roberts reveals to the Head that the real thief is Stokes, a farmhand, not Jim Thomson.

What happens

Inspector Roberts reveals to the Head that the real thief is Stokes, a farmhand, not Jim Thomson. He explains his detective work, including spotting a drunken man with money and tracing him. The cups are hidden in a hollow tree on Sir Alfred Venner's land. Roberts advises against prosecution to avoid turning Stokes into a hardened criminal. The Head, relieved Jim is innocent, prepares to apologize but also lecture him on betting. However, a note from Mr. Merevale reveals Jim has been missing since lunchtime.

Themes in this chapter

  • Crime and Detection

    Inspector Roberts details his investigation, from spotting a drunken suspect to tracing the stolen cups, highlighting the process of amateur crime detection.

  • Authority and Rebellion

    The Head's authority is challenged by his unjust suspicion of Jim and his reluctance to deal with Sir Alfred Venner, while Jim's disappearance hints at rebellion.

Characters to notice

  • Inspector Roberts

    Explains his investigation, identifies Stokes as the thief, and advises against prosecution.

  • The Head

    Relieved Jim is innocent, but struggles with the need to apologize and lecture Jim about betting; receives news of Jim's disappearance.

  • Jim Thomson

    Cleared of the burglary suspicion, but has been missing since lunchtime, causing concern.

  • Stokes

    Identified as the actual thief; a farmhand who stole the cups and hid them in a hollow tree.

  • Biffen

    Helped Inspector Roberts identify Stokes from a photograph.

  • Sir Alfred Venner

    His woods are where the cups are hidden; the Head is reluctant to contact him.

Key passages

  • Curious thing evidence. Very curious. Very seldom able to trust it.

    Evidence is often unreliable and can lead to false conclusions.

    Inspector Roberts reflects on the fallibility of evidence, having nearly convicted an innocent man.

  • If you prosecute, you get the man his term of imprisonment. A year, probably. Well and good. But then what happens? After his sentence has run out, he comes out of prison an ex-convict. Tries to get work. No good.

    Prosecution leads to imprisonment, but after release the man becomes an ex-convict unable to find work, likely returning to crime.

    Roberts argues against prosecution to prevent Stokes from becoming a hardened criminal.