All chapters

The Napoleon of Notting Hill · Chapter

Two Voices explained

In the aftermath of the final battle, two voices debate the meaning and legacy of Notting Hill.

What happens

In the aftermath of the final battle, two voices debate the meaning and legacy of Notting Hill. One voice argues that all empires end in blood and all things are the same; the other counters that the old things are eternally new and that Notting Hill's unique existence has irreplaceable value. Auberon Quin confesses that his creation of the Charter of the Cities was a practical joke, but Adam Wayne embraces the joke as a sacred reality, asserting that laughter and love are not opposed. They reconcile as complementary halves of a single human spirit and depart together into the unknown world.

Themes in this chapter

  • The Absurdity vs. Seriousness of Life

    The central debate between Quin's confession that it was all a joke and Wayne's insistence that the joke became a sacred reality, highlighting the coexistence of laughter and profound meaning.

  • The Creation of Meaning Through Art and Play

    Wayne argues that the child's games, taken with the seriousness of a Crusade, transform a nursery into a temple, illustrating how human action creates meaning.

  • The Poetry of the Everyday

    The dialogue elevates the ordinary suburb of Notting Hill to a unique and irreplaceable entity, asserting that every place and moment has poetic significance.

Characters to notice

  • Adam Wayne

    Defends the heroic and irreplaceable nature of Notting Hill, accepts Quin's confession, and proposes they wander the world together.

  • Auberon Quin

    Confesses that the entire Notting Hill movement was a joke, but ultimately reconciles with Wayne, acknowledging their complementary roles.

Key passages

  • So ends the Empire of Notting Hill. As it began in blood, so it ended in blood, and all things are always the same.

    The empire of Notting Hill has fallen, just as it started in violence, and everything in history repeats itself.

    The first voice's cynical view of historical cycles.

  • If all things are always the same, it is because they are always heroic. If all things are always the same, it is because they are always new.

    The reason things seem unchanging is that they are perpetually heroic and fresh.

    Wayne's counter-argument that constancy comes from eternal renewal.

  • It is the old things that startle and intoxicate. It is the old things that are young.

    Ancient things are the most surprising and invigorating; they possess a timeless youth.

    Wayne's assertion of the vitality of tradition.

  • Wayne, it was all a joke. When I made these cities, I cared no more for them than I care for a centaur, or a merman, or a fish with legs, or a pig with feathers, or any other absurdity.

    Quin confesses that his creation of the cities was a mere prank, as meaningless as mythical creatures.

    Quin's revelation of his original frivolous intent.

  • You and I, Auberon Quin, have both of us throughout our lives been again and again called mad. And we are mad. We are mad, because we are not two men, but one man.

    Both of us have been labeled insane, but our madness stems from being two halves of a single mind.

    Wayne's reconciliation of their apparent opposites.

  • Laughter and love are everywhere. The cathedrals, built in the ages that loved God, are full of blasphemous grotesques.

    Joy and affection permeate life; even sacred spaces contain irreverent humor.

    Wayne's final argument that laughter and respect coexist naturally.

The Napoleon of Notting Hill — Two Voices Explained