The Genealogy of Morals · Chapter
Chapter 5 explained
Nietzsche reflects on his earlier preoccupation with the value of morality, particularly the 'unegoistic' instincts of pity, self-denial, and self-sacrifice championed by Schopenhauer.
What happens
Nietzsche reflects on his earlier preoccupation with the value of morality, particularly the 'unegoistic' instincts of pity, self-denial, and self-sacrifice championed by Schopenhauer. He expresses deep mistrust of these instincts, seeing them as a dangerous seduction toward nihilism and the decline of European civilization. He notes that prior philosophers, including Plato, Spinoza, and Kant, unanimously held pity in contempt.
Themes in this chapter
Critique of Altruism and Pity Morality
Nietzsche directly challenges the value of pity and self-sacrifice, seeing them as symptoms of nihilism and a threat to life.
Characters to notice
- Schopenhauer
Nietzsche's great teacher, who deified pity and self-sacrifice as intrinsic values, leading Nietzsche to question their worth.
- Plato
Cited as one of the philosophers who held pity in contempt, alongside Spinoza and Kant.
- Spinoza
Mentioned as a philosopher who, despite differences, shared contempt for pity.
- Kant
Listed among those who dismissed pity as worthless.
Key passages
“The issue for me was the value of morality, and on that subject I had to place myself in a state of abstraction, in which I was almost alone with my great teacher Schopenhauer”
Nietzsche's central concern was assessing morality's worth, a task he undertook in solitary dialogue with Schopenhauer's ideas.
Highlights Nietzsche's departure from Schopenhauer's valuation of pity.
“I realised that the morality of pity which spread wider and wider, and whose grip infected even philosophers with its disease, was the most sinister symptom of our modern European civilisation”
Nietzsche saw the growing emphasis on pity as a dangerous sign of European decadence.
Connects pity morality to Nietzsche's broader critique of modern culture.