The Federalist Papers · Chapter
LXXVIII: The Judiciary Department explained
Hamilton argues for the independence of the judiciary, emphasizing life tenure during good behavior as essential to protect the Constitution and individual rights.
What happens
Hamilton argues for the independence of the judiciary, emphasizing life tenure during good behavior as essential to protect the Constitution and individual rights. He explains that courts must have the power to declare legislative acts void if they conflict with the Constitution, positioning the judiciary as an intermediate body between the people and the legislature. The judiciary is the weakest branch, with no influence over force or wealth, and requires firmness and permanency to resist encroachments from the other branches.
Themes in this chapter
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
Hamilton emphasizes the judiciary's weakness and the need for independence from the legislative and executive branches to maintain the separation of powers.
Constitutional Interpretation and Authority
The essay establishes the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution and declaring legislative acts void, asserting the supremacy of the Constitution over statutes.
Human Nature and the Capacity for Self-Government
Hamilton discusses the need for judicial fortitude against 'occasional ill humors' and the 'ordinary depravity of human nature' to protect rights.
Characters to notice
- Publius
Author of the essay, addressing the people of New York on the judiciary department.
- Alexander Hamilton
Primary author of Federalist No. 78, arguing for judicial independence and life tenure.
- Congress
Legislative body whose acts may be declared void by the judiciary if contrary to the Constitution.
- The Judges
Federal judges who hold office during good behavior, serving as guardians of the Constitution.
- The Senate
Part of the legislative branch; mentioned in context of checks on judicial appointments.
Key passages
“The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution.”
Judicial independence is especially crucial in a government with a written constitution that limits legislative power.
Hamilton argues that courts must be independent to enforce constitutional limits on the legislature.
“The judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.”
The judicial branch is the least threatening to political rights because it has no control over the military or the treasury.
Hamilton highlights the judiciary's weakness as a reason to protect its independence.
“It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority.”
The courts serve as a mediator between the people and the legislature, ensuring that lawmakers do not exceed their constitutional powers.
This passage articulates the concept of judicial review as a check on legislative authority.