The Federalist Papers · Chapter
LXXI: The Duration in Office of the Executive explained
Hamilton argues that a four-year term for the executive is necessary to ensure personal firmness and independence from the legislature, while still being short enough to preserve public liberty.
What happens
Hamilton argues that a four-year term for the executive is necessary to ensure personal firmness and independence from the legislature, while still being short enough to preserve public liberty. He contends that longer tenure encourages the executive to resist transient popular passions and legislative encroachments, and that a four-year term strikes the right balance between energy and accountability.
Themes in this chapter
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
Hamilton emphasizes the need for an independent executive to maintain the balance of power against legislative encroachment.
Human Nature and the Capacity for Self-Government
Discusses how the executive's attachment to office and fear of losing it influences his firmness and integrity.
Republican Government and Representation
Argues that the executive must sometimes resist transient popular impulses to serve the true public good.
Characters to notice
- Publius
Author of the essay, arguing for a four-year executive term.
- Alexander Hamilton
Likely author of this Federalist Paper, advocating for executive independence.
- The Senate
Mentioned indirectly as part of the legislative body that might encroach on executive power.
- Congress
Referenced as the legislative body whose humors the executive should not blindly follow.
- The Judges
Mentioned alongside the executive as a branch needing independence from the legislature.
Key passages
“The same rule which teaches the propriety of a partition between the various branches of power, teaches us likewise that this partition ought to be so contrived as to render the one independent of the other.”
The principle of separating powers also requires that each branch be made independent of the others.
Hamilton links separation of powers to the need for executive independence.
“It is one thing to be subordinate to the laws, and another to be dependent on the legislative body.”
Obeying the law is different from being under the control of the legislature.
Distinguishes lawful subordination from legislative domination.
“The republican principle demands that the deliberate sense of the community should govern the conduct of those to whom they entrust the management of their affairs; but it does not require an unqualified complaisance to every sudden breeze of passion.”
Republican government requires that the considered will of the people guide leaders, not every fleeting popular whim.
Defines the proper relationship between public opinion and executive action.