The Crowd · Chapter
Heterogeneous Crowds explained
This chapter explores the classification of heterogeneous crowds, emphasizing the paramount influence of race on crowd behavior.
What happens
This chapter explores the classification of heterogeneous crowds, emphasizing the paramount influence of race on crowd behavior. It argues that the spirit of the race limits the inferior characteristics of crowds, and that the crowd state represents a barbarian state from which a strong collective spirit helps a race emerge. The chapter also distinguishes between anonymous crowds and non-anonymous crowds, such as deliberative assemblies, noting how the sense of responsibility differs between them.
Themes in this chapter
Race and National Character
The chapter centers on race as the most powerful factor differentiating crowds, using examples of English, American, French, and other national crowds to illustrate inherited mental constitutions.
Psychology of Crowds
Explores how collective psychology differs from individual psychology, emphasizing that crowds are swayed by unconscious sentiments rather than intelligence.
Irrationality and Credulity
Implied in the discussion of crowds being under the sway of unconscious sentiments and the inferior characteristics of crowds being linked to a barbarian state.
Characters to notice
- Crowds
Discussed as the primary subject of the chapter, with focus on heterogeneous crowds and their racial variations.
- Unknown Narrator
The narrator presents the analysis of crowd psychology and racial influences.
Key passages
“The spirit of the crowd is weak in proportion as the spirit of the race is strong.”
The more a race's collective identity dominates, the less susceptible its members are to the irrational influences of crowds.
Highlights the inverse relationship between racial spirit and crowd mentality.
“A Latin crowd, however revolutionary or however conservative it be supposed, will invariably appeal to the intervention of the State to realise its demands.”
Latin crowds, regardless of political leaning, always seek government action to achieve their goals.
Illustrates how racial character shapes crowd behavior, specifically the tendency toward centralization and dictatorship.
“The crowd state and the domination of crowds is equivalent to the barbarian state, or to a return to it.”
Being in a crowd and being ruled by crowds is like reverting to a primitive, uncivilized condition.
Emphasizes the author's view of crowds as regressive and antithetical to civilization.