The Consolation of Philosophy · Chapter
Endnotes explained
This chapter provides endnotes referencing classical sources, philosophical doctrines, and textual clarifications for the main text, including citations from Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Euripides, and others, as well as explanations of Boethi
What happens
This chapter provides endnotes referencing classical sources, philosophical doctrines, and textual clarifications for the main text, including citations from Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Euripides, and others, as well as explanations of Boethius's arguments and allusions.
Themes in this chapter
Philosophy as Healing
Endnotes reference philosophical doctrines (e.g., from Plato and Aristotle) that underpin the healing of Boethius's understanding.
Providence and Fate
Notes allude to the distinction between providence and fate and the resolution of free will dilemmas, central to the work's themes.
Characters to notice
- Boethius
Referenced as the author and subject of the work, with notes clarifying his arguments and allusions.
- Philosophy
Mentioned in notes regarding her speaking role and the doctrines she presents.
- Plato
Frequently cited in endnotes for works such as Republic, Timaeus, Meno, Phaedo, Sophistes, and Gorgias.
- Aristotle
Referenced in notes on Physics and De Caelo.
- Cicero
Cited for De Republica and De Divinatione.
Key passages
“The Stoic, Epicurean, and other philosophical sects, which Boethius regards as heterodox.”
Boethius considers Stoic, Epicurean, and similar schools of thought as unorthodox.
Clarifies Boethius's view of certain philosophical traditions.
“The doctrine of Reminiscence—i.e., that all learning is really recollection—is set forth at length by Plato in the 'Meno' and the 'Phaedo'.”
Plato's theory of recollection holds that learning is actually remembering knowledge from a previous existence.
Explains a key Platonic concept referenced in the main text.