All chapters

The Bolshevik Myth · Chapter

A Bolshevik Trial explained

The narrator attends a trial at the Revolutionary Tribunal where a young man is accused of counterrevolutionary activities by a woman who is a Cheka member.

What happens

The narrator attends a trial at the Revolutionary Tribunal where a young man is accused of counterrevolutionary activities by a woman who is a Cheka member. The prosecutor Burov intimidates witnesses and disregards evidence, revealing the corrupt and vengeful nature of the Bolshevik judicial system. The narrator also witnesses a private exchange between the accuser and an old woman who pleads for mercy, highlighting the human cost of revolutionary justice.

Themes in this chapter

  • Terror and Violence

    The trial exemplifies the use of terror as a tool of state control, with witnesses intimidated and the prosecutor demanding execution based on flimsy evidence.

  • Betrayal of Revolutionary Ideals

    The judicial system is corrupted by personal vendettas and class prejudice, betraying the ideal of impartial justice.

  • Human Suffering and Dehumanization

    The accuser's vengeful demeanor and the old woman's plea for mercy highlight the dehumanization and suffering caused by the revolutionary process.

Characters to notice

  • Burov

    The predsedatel of the Cheka, acting as government prosecutor in the trial; he intimidates witnesses and demands the death sentence regardless of evidence.

  • Unknown Narrator

    Observes the trial and speaks with Burov, questioning the validity of the testimony and the fairness of the proceedings.

  • The Chekist

    The young woman who brings the charge against the prisoner; she is motivated by personal revenge and is a member of the Cheka.

Key passages

  • There is no fooling with us, and they know it

    Burov boasts that the Cheka's authority is absolute and that everyone fears them.

    Reflects the arrogance and intimidation tactics of the Cheka.

  • Must we always go on hating and killing?

    The old woman questions the endless cycle of vengeance and violence.

    A poignant critique of the revolutionary violence.