Table-Talk · Chapter
The Indian Jugglers explained
Hazlitt contrasts mechanical skill with artistic genius, using the Indian jugglers as a symbol of perfected but limited dexterity, while arguing that true greatness in art requires an indefinable, inspired quality that cannot be taught by r
What happens
Hazlitt contrasts mechanical skill with artistic genius, using the Indian jugglers as a symbol of perfected but limited dexterity, while arguing that true greatness in art requires an indefinable, inspired quality that cannot be taught by rules or replicated by mere practice.
Themes in this chapter
Art and Nature
Hazlitt distinguishes between mechanical skill (the juggler's feats) and fine art, which requires capturing nature's essence through sentiment and imagination.
Intellectual Superiority and Its Disadvantages
The author describes an individual whose versatility and talent prevent him from succeeding in any single profession, illustrating the burden of unapplied genius.
Fame, Reputation, and Public Opinion
Hazlitt argues that true greatness is measured by lasting impact on history, not by popularity or temporary notoriety.
Characters to notice
- William Hazlitt
The author and narrator, reflecting on the nature of genius, skill, and greatness.
- Sir Joshua Reynolds
Cited as a painter whose artistic greatness surpasses mere mechanical perfection, despite being a 'bungler' compared to a ropedancer.
- Oliver Goldsmith
Referenced indirectly through the line 'In argument they own'd his wondrous skill' from Goldsmith's works.
Key passages
“Talent differs from genius as voluntary differs from involuntary power. Ingenuity is genius in trifles; greatness is genius in undertakings of much pith and moment.”
Talent is a deliberate ability, while genius is an involuntary force; cleverness applies to small matters, but greatness tackles significant and weighty endeavors.
Hazlitt defines the core distinction between mere skill and true genius.
“The test of greatness is the page of history. Nothing can be said to be great that has a distinct limit, or that borders on something evidently greater than itself.”
True greatness is judged by its enduring historical impact; anything limited or overshadowed by something greater cannot be considered truly great.
Hazlitt emphasizes that lasting fame, not temporary popularity, defines greatness.
“To snatch this grace beyond the reach of art is then the height of art—where fine art begins, and where mechanical skill ends.”
Capturing an elusive, ineffable beauty that cannot be achieved by technique alone is the pinnacle of art, marking the boundary where fine art starts and mere mechanical skill stops.
Hazlitt articulates the transcendent quality that separates fine art from craft.