Short Fiction · Chapter
What Shall It Profit? explained
Arnold Radek, a journalist and commentator, confronts Dr.
What happens
Arnold Radek, a journalist and commentator, confronts Dr. Marcus Lang at the Institute of Human Biology, demanding to know if they have discovered a cure for aging. Lang admits to promising research but insists it will take a century to develop. Radek, suspicious and driven by the potential for immortality, investigates the Institute's secrecy and history, ultimately flying to their remote facility in the Four Corners country to press his case.
Themes in this chapter
Power and Corruption
The Institute's secrecy and potential hoarding of longevity research raise questions about the corrupting influence of power over life and death.
Technology and Control
The debate over whether to release or withhold a potential immortality cure highlights the tension between technological progress and societal control.
Freedom vs. Tyranny
Radek argues that only the whole race has the authority to decide on immortality, contrasting individual freedom with potential tyranny by a scientific elite.
Characters to notice
- Arnold Radek
A journalist who breaks into the Institute of Human Biology to confront Dr. Lang about a potential longevity cure.
- Dr. Marcus Lang
Director of the Institute of Human Biology, who defends the Institute's secrecy and discusses preliminary research on aging.
- Barwell
A former clerk at the Institute, fired for being too nosy, who provided Radek with information.
Key passages
“Every minute you hold back the cure for old age, you murder a million human beings.”
Radek accuses Lang of causing mass death by delaying the release of a longevity treatment.
Highlights the ethical urgency and Radek's aggressive stance.
“The living organism was a small island of low entropy in a universe tending constantly toward gigantic disorder.”
Life is a localized pocket of order in a universe that naturally moves toward chaos.
Scientific reflection on the nature of life and aging.
“But only the whole race had authority to make that decision.”
Decisions about immortality should be made collectively by all humanity, not by a select few.
Central to the theme of freedom vs. tyranny.