All chapters

Short Fiction · Chapter

The String explained

Maître Hauchecorne, a peasant, picks up a piece of string from the ground, but is falsely accused by his enemy Malandain of stealing a lost pocketbook.

What happens

Maître Hauchecorne, a peasant, picks up a piece of string from the ground, but is falsely accused by his enemy Malandain of stealing a lost pocketbook. Despite the pocketbook being returned by another man, Hauchecorne's reputation is ruined; he becomes obsessed with proving his innocence, but the townspeople mock and disbelieve him, leading to his mental decline and eventual death.

Themes in this chapter

  • Obsession and Delusion

    Hauchecorne becomes obsessed with proving his innocence, repeatedly telling the story of the string and adding new details, which only deepens his delusion and leads to his mental and physical decline.

  • Illusion vs. Reality

    The truth of Hauchecorne's innocence is overshadowed by the illusion of his guilt created by gossip and suspicion; his reality is distorted by the community's disbelief.

  • Cruelty and Suffering

    The townspeople's mockery and refusal to believe Hauchecorne, even after the pocketbook is found, cause him immense psychological suffering, ultimately leading to his death.

Characters to notice

  • Maître Hauchecorne

    The protagonist, a peasant from Bréauté, who picks up a piece of string and is falsely accused of theft, leading to his obsession with proving his innocence and his tragic death.

  • Maître Chicot

    Mentioned as Maître Malandain, the harness-maker and enemy of Hauchecorne, who falsely accuses him of stealing the pocketbook.

  • Césaire Houlbrèque

    The man from Manneville to whom the lost pocketbook is returned by Marius Paumelle.

Key passages

  • A piece of string, a piece of string⁠—look⁠—here it is, Mr. Mayor.

    Hauchecorne, in his dying delirium, continues to insist on his innocence by referring to the piece of string.

    This quote illustrates the tragic culmination of Hauchecorne's obsession and the futility of his attempts to clear his name.

  • He was believed so much the less as his defense was more complicated and his arguing more subtle.

    The more Hauchecorne tried to explain and prove his innocence, the less people believed him.

    Highlights the irony and tragic flaw in Hauchecorne's character: his elaborate defenses only deepen suspicion.