Short Fiction · Chapter
Solitude explained
After a male dinner-party, the narrator walks with a friend along the Champs-Élysées.
What happens
After a male dinner-party, the narrator walks with a friend along the Champs-Élysées. The friend delivers a long, anguished monologue about the fundamental and inescapable loneliness of every human being. He argues that all human efforts—love, friendship, conversation—are futile attempts to escape this isolation, and that no one can ever truly understand another's soul. He compares human isolation to the distance between stars and concludes that we are all as solitary as the Egyptian obelisk in the Place de la Concorde.
Themes in this chapter
Isolation and Loneliness
The entire chapter is a meditation on the inescapable solitude of the human spirit, arguing that no one can ever truly understand another person.
Illusion vs. Reality
The friend describes love and friendship as illusions that briefly mask the reality of eternal loneliness.
Love and Desire
The chapter examines how the desire for love and union is a futile attempt to escape solitude, with physical intimacy only deepening the sense of isolation.
Characters to notice
- Guy de Maupassant
The narrator, who listens to his friend's monologue and reflects on whether the man was drunk, mad, or inspired.
Key passages
“We are all of us in a wilderness. No man understands any other.”
Every person is fundamentally alone, and true understanding between individuals is impossible.
The friend quotes Flaubert to emphasize the theme of universal isolation.
“Look, we are all as that stone!”
Like the solitary obelisk standing alone in the square, every human being is ultimately isolated.
The friend's final dramatic gesture compares human solitude to the Egyptian obelisk in the Place de la Concorde.
“Les caresses ne sont que d’inquiets transports, Infructueux essais du pauvre amour qui tente L’impossible union des âmes par les corps.”
Physical caresses are merely restless, futile attempts by love to achieve the impossible union of souls through bodies.
The friend quotes Sully-Prudhomme to argue that physical intimacy cannot bridge the gap between two isolated spirits.