Saïd the Fisherman · Chapter
XV explained
Saïd, now destitute and accompanied by his servant Selìm, seeks an audience with the Sherìf Ismaìl Abbâs to beg for money.
What happens
Saïd, now destitute and accompanied by his servant Selìm, seeks an audience with the Sherìf Ismaìl Abbâs to beg for money. He presents a fabricated tale of his misfortunes, but the Sherìf sees through his lies and rebukes him for his dishonesty, noting that Selìm's loyalty and humility make him the true noble one. The Mufti and another dignitary also comment on the tale, with the Mufti accusing Saïd of being an unbeliever. Ultimately, Saïd is denied alms and left to face the consequences of his deceit.
Themes in this chapter
Social Class and Ambition
Saïd's attempt to climb socially by begging from the Sherìf contrasts with Selìm's humble loyalty, highlighting class distinctions and the pursuit of status.
Betrayal and Trust
Saïd's lies and manipulation betray the trust of his servant and the authorities, while Selìm's faithfulness stands in stark contrast.
Characters to notice
- Saïd the Fisherman
Presents a fabricated tale of destitution to the Sherìf, but is exposed as a liar and denied alms.
- Selìm
Loyal servant who accompanies Saïd and testifies to his former kindness, but also reveals his own humble background.
- Ismaìl Abbâs
The Sherìf who sees through Saïd's lies and delivers a stern judgment, praising Selìm's loyalty.
- The Mufti
Fat and prosperous judge who is skeptical of Saïd's story and accuses him of being an unbeliever.
Key passages
“Die of hunger, saidst thou?—Pshaw! ... What man ever did die of hunger in Damashc-esh-Shâm since Ibrahìm El Khalìl was king over it?”
The Mufti dismisses the idea of starvation in Damascus, implying that no true believer would be left without food.
The Mufti's response reflects his skepticism and the social safety net of the community.
“I tell thee that this man, who has humbled himself as a servant before thee, is thy lord in all goodness.”
The Sherìf points out that Selìm's humility and service make him morally superior to Saïd.
This statement underscores the theme of true nobility versus false pretensions.