Resurrection · Chapter
LVI explained
Nekhlúdoff observes the painful parting of prisoners and their visitors at the prison, feeling deep moral nausea at the injustice and suffering caused by the legal system.
What happens
Nekhlúdoff observes the painful parting of prisoners and their visitors at the prison, feeling deep moral nausea at the injustice and suffering caused by the legal system. The inspector reluctantly enforces the separation, while Nekhlúdoff is particularly struck by the plight of innocent prisoners like Menshóff and the brutalizing effect on jailers.
Themes in this chapter
Injustice of the Legal System
Nekhlúdoff reflects on the hundreds of guiltless people imprisoned due to bureaucratic errors, and the cruelty of jailers who torment their brothers.
Moral Awakening and Redemption
Nekhlúdoff's growing moral nausea and questioning of the system's purpose mark his deepening awakening to social injustice.
Characters to notice
- Prince Dmitri Ivanovich Nekhludoff
Witnesses the prison farewells, experiences moral nausea, and is reminded of the injustice of the system.
- Vera Doukhova
Nekhlúdoff takes leave of her as the visit ends.
- Mary Pavlovna Schetinina
Leaves the visiting room with the boy born in prison.
- The Inspector
Kindhearted but troubled inspector who reluctantly orders the prisoners and visitors to part.
- Menshoff
Mentioned as an innocent prisoner whose suffering and perplexity Nekhlúdoff finds terrible.
Key passages
“Terrible were the brutalised jailers, whose occupation is to torment their brothers, and who were certain that they were fulfilling an important and useful duty; but most terrible of all seemed this sickly, elderly, kindhearted inspector, who was obliged to part mother and son, father and daughter, who were just the same sort of people as he and his own children.”
The jailers, brutalized by their work, believed they were doing a vital service, but the most horrifying figure was the frail, good-natured inspector forced to separate families just like his own.
Nekhlúdoff's internal condemnation of the system's dehumanizing effect on both prisoners and officials.
“What is it all for? Nekhlúdoff asked himself, and could not find an answer.”
Nekhlúdoff questioned the purpose of all this suffering but found no explanation.
Highlights Nekhlúdoff's existential crisis and moral confusion.