Religion and the Rise of Capitalism · Chapter
III: The Triumph of Economic Virtues explained
This chapter examines how Puritanism, initially critical of economic greed, evolved to sanctify commercial enterprise as a divine calling.
What happens
This chapter examines how Puritanism, initially critical of economic greed, evolved to sanctify commercial enterprise as a divine calling. It traces the shift from medieval and early Reformation suspicion of moneymaking to a later Puritan idealization of trade, where diligence, thrift, and success in business were seen as signs of grace. The chapter highlights the reconciliation between religious duty and economic expediency, the controversy over usury, and the secularization of Puritan ethics as it adapted to the expanding commercial world of seventeenth-century England.
Themes in this chapter
Puritanism and the Capitalist Spirit
The chapter details how Puritanism evolved to sanctify moneymaking as a divine calling, bridging the gap between religious duty and economic enterprise.
Conflict Between Ethics and Economics
The tension between traditional moral condemnations of covetousness and the new applause for economic enterprise is a central theme, resolved by the argument that enterprise is a duty imposed by God.
Secularization of Social Thought
Puritanism, in becoming a political force, was secularized and committed to compromise, with its practical result being liberty rather than discipline.
Transformation of Social Ethics
The chapter shows the transformation of social ethics from a collectivist, half-communistic aspect to an individualism congenial to business, where virtues like diligence and thrift became conducive to commercial success.
Characters to notice
- The Puritan
The Puritan movement is central, evolving from a backward-looking critique of economic abuses to a forward-looking embrace of enterprise as a divine calling.
- John Calvin
Calvin's qualified concession to practical economic exigencies is noted; his doctrine on moderate interest was later hailed by Puritan hypocrites.
- Martin Luther
Luther advanced the idea of the calling as a weapon against monasticism, but his outlook remained patriarchal on economic matters.
- Richard Baxter
Baxter is referenced as a Puritan divine who insisted on the duty of labor in a calling and the importance of works as evidence of faith.
- Calvinism
Calvinism is described as containing two elements—imprimatur to business enterprise and inquisitorial discipline—which later flew apart in England.
- Puritanism
Puritanism is portrayed as adding a halo of ethical sanctification to economic expediency, reconciling religion and business.
- Mr. Robert Keane
Referenced indirectly through the phrase 'Mr. Gripeman, the schoolmaster of Love-gain,' a satirical figure representing the pursuit of profit.
- The Church
The Church is mentioned in the context of the Puritan complaint that religious radicalism went hand in hand with economic radicalism.
Key passages
“The faithful, it was urged, had interpreted only too literally the doctrine that the sinner was saved, not by works, but by faith.”
Critics argued that believers had taken the doctrine of salvation by faith alone as a license to ignore good works.
This reflects the tension between faith and works in Puritan economic ethics.
“The conception to which it appealed to bridge the gulf sprang from the very heart of Puritan theology. It was that expressed in the characteristic and oft-used phrase, 'a Calling.'”
The key idea that reconciled religion and business was the Puritan concept of a 'calling,' which made secular work a divine duty.
The calling is central to the chapter's argument about the sanctification of economic life.
“By a kind of happy, preestablished harmony, such as a later age discovered between the needs of society and the self-interest of the individual, success in business is in itself almost a sign of spiritual grace.”
There was a convenient alignment where business success was seen as evidence of God's favor, much like later theories of social harmony through self-interest.
This highlights the ideological shift toward equating profit with piety.
“Between the old-fashioned denunciation of uncharitable covetousness and the new-fashioned applause of economic enterprise, a bridge is thrown by the argument which urges that enterprise itself is the discharge of a duty imposed by God.”
The old condemnation of greed was replaced by praise for economic enterprise, justified by the idea that business activity fulfills a God-given duty.
This summarizes the chapter's main thesis about the transformation of economic ethics.