Progress and Poverty · Chapter
II: Rent and the Law of Rent explained
This chapter defines rent in its economic sense as the share of wealth accruing to landowners by virtue of their ownership of natural capabilities, distinct from payments for improvements.
What happens
This chapter defines rent in its economic sense as the share of wealth accruing to landowners by virtue of their ownership of natural capabilities, distinct from payments for improvements. It explains that rent arises from the monopoly of land, determined by the excess of produce over what the same labor and capital could secure from the least productive land in use (Ricardo's law of rent). The chapter argues that as productive power increases, rising land values absorb the gains, preventing wages and interest from rising, and that rent is the price of monopoly, not a reward for production.
Themes in this chapter
Land Ownership and Rent
Defines rent as the monopoly price of land, determined by the margin of cultivation, and explains how land ownership appropriates surplus production.
Distribution of Wealth
Shows how rent absorbs increases in productive power, leaving wages and interest stagnant or falling, illustrating the division of wealth between landowners and laborers.
Poverty and Progress
Connects rising land values to the failure of wages and interest to increase with productive power, explaining persistent poverty amid progress.
Characters to notice
- John Stuart Mill
Cited as the economist who denominated the law of rent the 'pons asinorum' of political economy.
- David Ricardo
Recognized for first prominently bringing the law of rent into notice, though not the first to announce it.
Key passages
“The rent of land is determined by the excess of its produce over that which the same application can secure from the least productive land in use.”
Land rent equals the extra output from a piece of land compared to what the same labor and capital could produce on the least productive land being used.
This is Ricardo's law of rent, presented as a self-evident axiom.
“Rent, in short, is the price of monopoly, arising from the reduction to individual ownership of natural elements which human exertion can neither produce nor increase.”
Rent is essentially a monopoly charge that comes from privately owning natural resources that people cannot create or expand.
Highlights the monopolistic nature of land ownership as the source of rent.