Poetry · Chapter
Chapter XVII explained
The speaker reflects on the nature of love and egoism, suggesting that love itself is more real than the lovers.
What happens
The speaker reflects on the nature of love and egoism, suggesting that love itself is more real than the lovers. This leads to a metaphysical doubt: perhaps humans are mere intervals or absences in a greater consciousness, and the speaker questions whether truth can bear such a fruit.
Themes in this chapter
Love and Loss
The poem explores love as an entity separate from the lovers, questioning its primacy and reality.
Epistemological Uncertainty
The speaker doubts the substance of the world and whether humans are mere absences in consciousness.
Characters to notice
Key passages
“My love, and not I, is the egoist. My love for thee loves itself more than thee; Ay, more than me, in whom it doth exist, And makes me live that it may feed on me.”
My love, not I, is selfish. It loves itself more than you, and even more than me, and it keeps me alive only to sustain itself.
The speaker distinguishes between self and love, portraying love as a parasitic force.
“In the country of bridges the bridge is More real than the shores it doth unsever; So in our world, all of Relation, this Is true—that truer is Love than either lover.”
In a land of bridges, the bridge is more real than the shores it connects; similarly, in our relational world, love is more real than the lovers themselves.
The metaphor of the bridge illustrates love's primacy over the individuals involved.
“If we, seeing substance of this world, are not Mere Intervals, God’s Absence and no more, Hollows in real Consciousness and Thought.”
If we, who perceive the world's substance, are merely gaps or absences in God's presence, hollow spaces within true consciousness and thought.
The speaker entertains a radical doubt about human existence as mere emptiness.
“And if ’tis possible to Thought to bear this fruit, Why should it not be possible to Truth?”
And if thought can produce this idea, why couldn't truth also be capable of it?
The speaker questions whether truth can accommodate such a bleak vision of reality.