Phineas Redux · Chapter
The Debate explained
The debate on the Address resumes after a two-day interval, with Mr.
What happens
The debate on the Address resumes after a two-day interval, with Mr. Gresham's temper and strategy criticized while Mr. Daubeny's political maneuvering is praised. Resignations of Lord Drummond and Mr. Boffin occur, but the Conservative government holds together. Mr. Turnbull and Mr. Monk speak in favor of the Address, leading to a government majority of fifteen. The Liberal party's disunity raises questions about future leadership.
Themes in this chapter
Political Ambition and Compromise
Mr. Daubeny's strategic maneuvering and the willingness of Liberals like Mr. Turnbull to accept reform from a disliked minister highlight the compromises inherent in political ambition.
Scandal and Public Opinion
The resignations of Mr. Boffin and Lord Drummond, and the public's canonization of Mr. Boffin, show how scandal and public opinion shape political fortunes.
Characters to notice
- Mr. Gresham
Delivered a fine speech but is criticized for imprudence and loss of temper; retreats from party consultations.
- Mr. Daubeny
Praised for excellent strategy; his government survives with only two resignations despite proposing Church disestablishment.
- Mr. Bonteen
Expresses dismay at the Liberal party's situation, commenting on the loss of the battle.
- Mr. Monk
Speaks in favor of the Address, supporting the government's proposal on Church reform.
- Mr. Turnbull
Declares he dislikes Mr. Daubeny but will accept the 'bribe' of reform; his speech signals the government's likely victory.
- Barrington Erle
Referred to as Ratler; whispers about Mr. Monk's alignment and laments the party's disarray.
- Lord Cantrip
Visits Mr. Gresham multiple times during the interval.
- Plantagenet Palliser
Seen by Mr. Gresham as a former Chancellor of the Exchequer under him.
Key passages
“There is nothing so prejudicial to a cause as temper. This man is declared to be unfit for any position of note, because he always shows temper.”
Losing one's temper is highly damaging to a political cause, and a person known for it is deemed unsuitable for important roles.
Reflects the criticism of Mr. Gresham's conduct during the debate.
“We want practical results rather than truth. A clear head is worth more than an honest heart.”
In politics, achieving tangible outcomes is valued more than absolute honesty, and rationality is prized over sincerity.
Summarizes the pragmatic view of political leadership in the chapter.
“When men wanted power, either to grasp at it or to retain it, then they offered bribes to the people. But in the taking of such bribes there was no dishonesty, and he should willingly take this bribe.”
Politicians offer reforms as bribes to gain or keep power, and accepting such bribes is not dishonest; the speaker will accept this one.
Mr. Turnbull's justification for supporting the government's proposal despite his distrust of Mr. Daubeny.