On a Chinese Screen · Chapter
XLVIII: A Student of the Drama explained
The narrator receives a visit from a young Chinese professor of Comparative Modern Literature, who has studied in Europe and advocates for Scribe as the model for Chinese drama.
What happens
The narrator receives a visit from a young Chinese professor of Comparative Modern Literature, who has studied in Europe and advocates for Scribe as the model for Chinese drama. Their conversation reveals the professor's narrow specialization, his ignorance of Chinese philosophy, and his perplexity at the narrator's simple views on playwriting. The chapter satirizes academic pedantry and the clash between Western theatrical ideals and Chinese tradition.
Themes in this chapter
Cultural Clash and Misunderstanding
The professor's Western education and advocacy for Scribe clash with the narrator's references to Chinese philosophy and traditional drama, revealing mutual incomprehension.
Futility of Western Superiority
The narrator's condescending attitude toward the professor's academic specialization and the professor's inability to engage with Chinese philosophy suggest the limits of Western intellectual frameworks.
Characters to notice
- The Stranger
The narrator, who hosts the professor and engages in a dialogue about drama and literature.
Key passages
“He sent in a neat card of the correct shape and size, deeply bordered in black, upon which under his name was printed 'Professor of Comparative Modern Literature.'”
The professor presented a formal visiting card with his title.
Introduces the professor's formal, Western-influenced presentation.
“It was curious to hear him demand that the drama should be exciting. He was asking for the pièce bien faite, the scène à faire, the curtain, the unexpected, the dramatic.”
He advocated for a well-made, suspenseful play in the style of Scribe.
Highlights the professor's preference for Western dramatic structure over traditional Chinese symbolism.
“I know only two. One is to have common sense and the other is to stick to the point.”
The narrator claims that writing a play requires only common sense and focus.
The narrator's simplistic view contrasts with the professor's academic approach.