Moribund Society and Anarchy · Chapter
VIII: The Magistracy explained
This chapter critiques the institution of the magistracy, tracing its origins from divine right to its modern guise as the guardian of 'law.' It argues that law is merely the will of the strongest, used by the ruling class to maintain privi
What happens
This chapter critiques the institution of the magistracy, tracing its origins from divine right to its modern guise as the guardian of 'law.' It argues that law is merely the will of the strongest, used by the ruling class to maintain privilege and suppress dissent. The text rejects the legitimacy of judges and legal authority, asserting that true justice can only emerge from a society without private property and coercive laws.
Themes in this chapter
Negation of Authority
The chapter systematically denies the legitimacy of magistrates, law, and any superior authority that claims to judge or punish.
Critique of Private Property
The suppression of private property is presented as necessary for ending the enslavement of the majority by a few.
Individualism and Solidarity
The text contrasts individual freedom with the solidarity of those oppressed, arguing for a future harmony through free action.
Social Revolution
The chapter calls for changing the social system entirely rather than modifying laws, advocating for revolutionary transformation.
Characters to notice
- Unknown Narrator
The narrator delivers a sustained critique of the magistracy and law, speaking for the anarchist perspective.
- Their Masters
Referenced as the new masters who created the entity of 'law' to defend privilege after the bourgeoisie seized power.
- The Anarchists
Implied as the 'we' who reject the legitimacy of law and judges, advocating for a social revolution.
- Proudhon
Not directly mentioned, but the critique of property and authority aligns with Proudhon's ideas.
Key passages
“The law, then, is not just; it has not that respectable character with which men have sought to invest it.”
The law lacks inherent justice and the moral authority attributed to it.
The narrator denies the moral foundation of law.
“We may then conclude that the law being nothing but the will of the strongest, one is obliged to obey it only when too weak to resist it.”
Law is merely the expression of power, and obedience is only required when one cannot resist.
This summarizes the chapter's view of law as coercive force.
“We do not judge, but work and struggle; and we believe that universal harmony will result from the free action of all men, when once the suppression of private property no longer permits a handful of persons to enslave their fellows.”
Instead of judging, we act and fight; harmony will come from freedom once private property is abolished.
The narrator outlines the anarchist alternative to legal judgment.