All chapters

Memoirs of a Revolutionist · Chapter

XIII explained

Kropotkin joins the Circle of Tchaikovsky in spring 1872, describing its origins as a self-education group opposed to Nechayev's conspiratorial methods, its emphasis on moral individuality, and its evolution into a center for socialist prop

What happens

Kropotkin joins the Circle of Tchaikovsky in spring 1872, describing its origins as a self-education group opposed to Nechayev's conspiratorial methods, its emphasis on moral individuality, and its evolution into a center for socialist propaganda and book distribution among students and workers.

Themes in this chapter

  • Revolutionary Idealism and Sacrifice

    The Circle of Tchaikovsky's members are portrayed as morally superior individuals who later fell in the struggle against autocracy, embodying self-sacrifice for revolutionary ideals.

  • Intellectual Awakening and Education

    The circle's work in spreading books by Lassalle, Marx, and others, and its role in educating youth and workers across Russia.

  • Anarchism vs. State Socialism

    The circle's rejection of hierarchical organization and its emphasis on autonomy and moral individuality reflect anarchist principles in contrast to state socialism.

Characters to notice

  • Peter Kropotkin

    Narrator and new member of the Circle of Tchaikovsky, sharing impressions of the International Workingmen's Association.

  • Dmitri Kelnitz

    Kropotkin's university friend who invites him to join the Circle of Tchaikovsky; described as intelligent, selfless, and sarcastic.

  • Nikolai Tchaikovsky

    Founding member of the Circle of Tchaikovsky; Kropotkin's friendship with him remains unshaken for 27 years.

  • Sophie Perovskaya

    Mentioned as one of the original members of the self-education circle that became the Circle of Tchaikovsky.

  • Nechayev

    His failed secret revolutionary organization and deceitful methods are contrasted with the Circle of Tchaikovsky's ethical approach.

Key passages

  • morally developed individuality must be the foundation of every organization, whatever political character it may take afterward, and whatever programme of action it may adopt in the course of future events.

    A person's moral growth is the essential basis for any group, regardless of its future political form or plan.

    Core principle of the Circle of Tchaikovsky, contrasting with Nechayev's methods.

  • The circle accepted as members only persons who were well known and had been tested in various circumstances, and of whom it was felt that they could be trusted absolutely.

    Only those who were thoroughly known and proven trustworthy in diverse situations were admitted.

    Describes the careful, trust-based membership process of the circle.