Marius the Epicurean · Chapter
XX: Two Curious Houses explained
Marius attends a supper in Tusculum honoring Apuleius, hosted by a poet.
What happens
Marius attends a supper in Tusculum honoring Apuleius, hosted by a poet. The evening blends Roman elegance, literary discourse, and philosophical reflection. Apuleius discusses Platonic Idealism, asserting that material things are 'full of souls.' Marius remains skeptical, clinging to empirical reality while acknowledging the allure of such theories.
Themes in this chapter
The Role of Art and Literature in Shaping Experience
The supper features literary recitals and Apuleius's discourse, highlighting how art and literature mediate perception of reality.
Epicurean Philosophy and the Pursuit of Pleasure
Marius's skeptical empiricism and his resistance to idealist fantasies reflect an Epicurean-like reliance on sensory experience.
The Transition from Paganism to Christianity
The chapter explores pagan philosophical and mystical ideas (Platonic Idealism, animism) against Marius's yearning for transcendence in a 'hard world.'
Characters to notice
- Marius
Guest at the supper; reflects on his changed perspective and skepticism toward Platonic Idealism.
- Apuleius
Honored guest; delivers a discourse on Platonic Idealism, blending philosophy with personal affectation.
- Ceyx
Mentioned in the recital of the myth of Ceyx and Alcyone.
- Plato
Referenced as the source of the Idealism espoused by Apuleius.
- Socrates
Mentioned as Plato's old master, a two-sided figure.
Key passages
“It was as if he viewed it through a diminishing glass.”
The world seemed less significant and more distant to Marius after his transformative experience.
Describes Marius's altered perception of reality.
“Were not all visible objects—the whole material world indeed, according to the consistent testimony of philosophy in many forms—'full of souls'?”
Apuleius argues that all material things are animated by souls, as philosophy suggests.
Central to Apuleius's Platonic discourse.
“For himself, it was clear, he must still hold by what his eyes really saw.”
Marius resolves to trust only his empirical observations.
Highlights Marius's skeptical stance.