All chapters

The Death of Ivan Ilyich and Other Stories · Chapter

Polikoúshka explained

The proprietress and her steward, Egór Miháylovitch, debate which serf to send as a recruit.

What happens

The proprietress and her steward, Egór Miháylovitch, debate which serf to send as a recruit. The steward wishes to protect the Doútlof family and send the disreputable domestic serf Polikoúshka, but the mistress, moved by pity for Polikoúshka's family, resists. The discussion reveals the arbitrary power of the landowner and the precarious lives of the serfs. The mistress ultimately decides to send Polikoúshka on a different errand—to collect a large sum of money from a merchant—as a test of his reformed character, a decision he proudly reports to his anxious wife, Akoulína.

Themes in this chapter

  • Social Class and Hierarchy

    The absolute power of the proprietress over the lives of her serfs is central. The steward must navigate her whims, while serfs like Polikoúshka live in desperate poverty with no control over their fate.

  • Fate, Injustice, and Suffering

    The arbitrary nature of the recruiting decision determines a family's future. Polikoúshka's poverty and bad reputation make him vulnerable, while the Doútlofs' relative stability is also threatened by the same system.

  • Hypocrisy and Social Pretense

    The mistress's 'benevolent' decision to test Polikoúshka with a large sum of money is a pretense that ignores the real danger and pressure it places on him. The steward performs servility while strategically manipulating the conversation.

Characters to notice

  • Polikéy (Polikoúshka)

    A domestic serf with a bad reputation for theft. His family lives in squalor. The mistress debates sending him as a recruit but instead tasks him with collecting a large debt, presenting it as a test of his reform.

  • Egór Miháylovitch

    The steward, a former domestic serf. He manipulates the conversation with the proprietress, aiming to send Polikoúshka as a recruit to protect the Doútlof family, whom he considers valuable peasants.

  • Akoulína

    Polikoúshka's wife. She is anxious and weeping, fearing her husband will be taken as a soldier. She tends to their many children in their cramped cubicle.

  • The Master / Proprietress

    The landowner (referred to as 'madam'). She is capricious and sentimental, wishing to avoid hardship for both Polikoúshka and the unknown Doútlofs, but ultimately exercises her absolute power in a way that seems benevolent but is fraught with risk.

  • Simeon Doútlof

    Mentioned indirectly. His family of three eligible men is at risk of providing a recruit. The steward argues they are 'good fellows' and should be protected.

  • Dounyásha

    A maidservant. She interrupts the mistress's conversation with the steward to deliver a message and is privately annoyed at him for upsetting the mistress's routine.

Key passages

  • “Just as you please to order, madam! Only it would be a pity if it’s the Doútlofs. They’re all good fellows, and one of them must go if we don’t send at least one of the domestic serfs,” said the steward.

    The steward pretends to defer to the lady's judgment while clearly steering her towards sending a domestic serf like Polikoúshka instead of a valuable peasant from the Doútlof family.

    Highlights the steward's manipulative tactics and the economic calculus behind selecting recruits.

  • “I don’t wish the Doútlofs any ill!” she said feelingly.

    The proprietress expresses sentimental concern for the Doútlofs, but her refusal to grasp the practical consequence (paying for a substitute) shows her detached, privileged position.

    Illustrates the landowner's good intentions clouded by a lack of practical understanding of the system she controls.

  • “You have been regarded,” she says, “as an untrustworthy man; but I trust you more than another”... “here is the first proof that I believe you.”

    Polikoúshka recounts how the mistress framed the dangerous task of collecting money as a reward and a test of his reform, playing on his desire for redemption.

    Shows how power can dress up a perilous assignment as an act of grace, increasing the psychological burden on the subordinate.