All chapters

I Will Repay · Chapter

XXIII: Justice explained

The chapter depicts a day at the Revolutionary Tribunal, where Foucquier-Tinville prosecutes prisoners with ruthless efficiency.

What happens

The chapter depicts a day at the Revolutionary Tribunal, where Foucquier-Tinville prosecutes prisoners with ruthless efficiency. The hall is filled with a degraded mob, and among the deputies present is Paul Déroulède, whose presence briefly softens the crowd. The accused are brought forth as the proceedings continue.

Themes in this chapter

  • Class and Revolution

    The tribunal's impartiality is a sham: the guillotine falls equally on duke and prostitute, yet the mob's degradation and the elite deputies' presence highlight class divisions.

  • Mob Mentality and Populism

    The crowd of spectators, including women and children, is depicted as brutish and bloodthirsty, seeking entertainment in the spectacle of trials.

Characters to notice

  • Foucquier-Tinville

    The Public Prosecutor, indefatigable and proud of obtaining thirty convictions out of thirty-five indictments.

  • Paul Déroulède

    Present as a citizen-deputy, sitting with folded arms, his face lit by the lamp; a child recognizes him fondly.

  • Citizen Merlin

    Minister of Justice, seated among the deputies observing the trial.

  • Robespierre

    Present, watching with pale eyes and a disdainful smile.

Key passages

  • Out of five and thirty indictments, Foucquier-Tinville had obtained thirty convictions. No wonder his friends declared that he had surpassed himself.

    Foucquier-Tinville secured guilty verdicts for thirty out of thirty-five defendants, earning praise from his allies.

    Highlights the prosecutor's efficiency and the tribunal's lack of genuine justice.

  • The guillotine was impartial, and fell with equal velocity on the neck of the proud duke and the gutter-born fille de joie, on a descendant of the Bourbons and the wastrel born in a brothel.

    The guillotine treated all social classes alike, executing aristocrats and commoners without distinction.

    Ironically underscores the Revolution's claim of equality while condemning its brutal methods.