Erewhon · Chapter
Endnotes explained
The endnotes provide commentary on Erewhonian myths, language, and the personification of machines, noting the use of terms that imply vitality and idiosyncrasy in machines, and referencing a future collection of examples.
What happens
The endnotes provide commentary on Erewhonian myths, language, and the personification of machines, noting the use of terms that imply vitality and idiosyncrasy in machines, and referencing a future collection of examples.
Themes in this chapter
Machines and Evolution
The endnotes discuss the recognition of machine vitality and idiosyncrasies, echoing the Erewhonian theory of machine evolution.
Truth and Deception
The narrator's disclaimer about not believing the Erewhonian Professor's theory, while still collecting examples, highlights a tension between factual reporting and fictional narrative.
Characters to notice
- Samuel Butler
Referenced as the writer who would have been known to the author of the root analogy.
- Professors of Unreason
Their theory about machine vitality is mentioned, though the narrator disclaims belief in it.
Key passages
“What a safe word “relation” is; how little it predicates! yet it has overgrown “kinsman.””
The word 'relation' is vague and non-committal, yet it has replaced the more specific term 'kinsman'.
Commentary on language evolution and semantic shift.
“I am also informed, that almost all machines have their own tricks and idiosyncrasies; that they know their drivers and keepers; and that they will play pranks upon a stranger.”
I have been told that machines have unique behaviors, recognize their operators, and may act mischievously with unfamiliar people.
Observation on the perceived personality of machines.