Democracy and Education · Chapter
Responsibility explained
This chapter explores intellectual responsibility as the disposition to consider and accept the probable consequences of one's actions, emphasizing that genuine belief and knowledge require working through the implications of ideas rather t
What happens
This chapter explores intellectual responsibility as the disposition to consider and accept the probable consequences of one's actions, emphasizing that genuine belief and knowledge require working through the implications of ideas rather than mere verbal assent. It contrasts superficial thoroughness with intellectual thoroughness, which involves seeing a thing through by subordinating details to a unified purpose.
Themes in this chapter
Unity of Knowledge and Action
The chapter argues that true belief and knowledge involve identifying the self with the conduct demanded by facts and foresight of results, linking thought to deliberate action.
Critique of Traditional Curriculum
Criticizes the congestion of school subjects and mechanical drill, which fail to develop intellectual responsibility and genuine understanding.
Key passages
“By responsibility as an element in intellectual attitude is meant the disposition to consider in advance the probable consequences of any projected step and deliberately to accept them: to accept them in the sense of taking them into account, acknowledging them in action, not yielding a mere verbal assent.”
Intellectual responsibility means thinking ahead about the likely outcomes of a decision and committing to act on those outcomes, not just agreeing in words.
Defines the core concept of responsibility in intellectual attitude.
“It would be much better to have fewer facts and truths in instruction—that is, fewer things supposedly accepted—if a smaller number of situations could be intellectually worked out to the point where conviction meant something real—some identification of the self with the type of conduct demanded by facts and foresight of results.”
Teaching fewer facts deeply is more valuable than covering many superficially, because true conviction requires personal engagement with the implications of knowledge.
Argues for depth over breadth in education to foster genuine understanding.
“Intellectual thoroughness is seeing a thing through. It depends upon a unity of purpose to which details are subordinated, not upon presenting a multitude of disconnected details.”
True thoroughness means following an idea to its conclusion, guided by a coherent purpose, rather than just accumulating many unrelated facts.
Distinguishes intellectual thoroughness from mechanical completeness.