All chapters

Culture and Anarchy · Chapter

Chapter II: Doing as One Likes and the Real Estate Intestacy Bill explained

Arnold critiques the Real Estate Intestacy Bill and the Liberal notion of 'doing as one likes,' arguing that such mechanical reforms fail to address deeper social ills.

What happens

Arnold critiques the Real Estate Intestacy Bill and the Liberal notion of 'doing as one likes,' arguing that such mechanical reforms fail to address deeper social ills. He contrasts the Barbarians' feudal landholding with the need for a disinterested, cultural approach that appeals to reason and consciousness, ultimately advocating for 'sweetness and light' over force.

Themes in this chapter

  • Social Class and the 'Three Classes'

    Arnold analyzes the Barbarians, Philistines, and Populace, showing how feudal landholding affects each class's welfare and ideals.

  • Critique of Liberalism and 'Doing as One Likes'

    The chapter critiques the Liberal approach of mechanical reforms like the Real Estate Intestacy Bill, arguing for a deeper cultural and rational engagement.

  • Machinery vs. Ends

    Arnold contrasts the 'machinery' of stock notions and legal reforms with the true end of human welfare and perfection.

Characters to notice

  • Narrator

    The narrator reflects on the Real Estate Intestacy Bill and the nature of rights, duties, and welfare.

  • Mr. Bright

    Mr. Bright is cited as a speaker who supported the Real Estate Intestacy Bill in the House of Commons.

  • Barbarians

    The Barbarians are the landholding class whose feudal habits and succession rules are critiqued.

  • Philistine

    The Philistines (middle class) are described as being misled by the false ideal of wealth and station.

  • Bishop Wilson

    Bishop Wilson is quoted: 'Riches are almost always abused without a very extraordinary grace.'

  • Solomon

    Solomon is referenced: 'As he who putteth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a fool.'

Key passages

  • Riches are almost always abused without a very extraordinary grace.

    Wealth is nearly always misused unless a person has exceptional moral strength.

    Bishop Wilson's aphorism is used to critique the Barbarians' unearned privilege.

  • As he who putteth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a fool.

    Honoring a foolish person is as destructive as hurling a stone from a sling.

    Solomon's proverb illustrates how the false ideal of wealth harms society.

  • Pouvoir sans savoir est fort dangereux.

    Power without knowledge is very dangerous.

    A French moralist's saying underscores the peril of inherited power in a settled society.