Barlaam and Ioasaph · Chapter
The Authorship explained
This chapter examines the authorship of 'Barlaam and Ioasaph', traditionally attributed to St.
What happens
This chapter examines the authorship of 'Barlaam and Ioasaph', traditionally attributed to St. John of Damascus. It presents arguments for and against this attribution, notably those of H. Zotenberg, and concludes that the evidence, including doctrinal similarities and the work's context within the Iconoclastic Controversy, supports the traditional view.
Themes in this chapter
The Monastic Ideal
The chapter highlights the work's enthusiasm for the monastic ideal, aligning it with the author's likely monastic background.
Idolatry vs. True Worship
The defense of images and denunciation of idolatry are key points linking the work to the Iconoclastic Controversy.
Characters to notice
- John of Damascus
Traditional author of the work; the chapter defends his authorship against Zotenberg's challenges.
- H. Zotenberg
Scholar who argued against John of Damascus's authorship; his arguments are examined and found insufficient.
Key passages
“The question of the authorship of Barlaam and Ioasaph cannot be passed over in silence, but considerations of space will only allow us to sum up the arguments and conclusions as briefly as possible.”
The authorship of Barlaam and Ioasaph must be addressed, though briefly due to space constraints.
Opening statement establishing the chapter's focus.
“We think therefore that the name of St. John of Damascus has still a right to appear on the title-page.”
Thus, St. John of Damascus remains a credible author for the work.
Concluding assertion supporting traditional attribution.