All chapters

Anna Karenina · Chapter

Chapter XII explained

Anna, Vronsky, and Golenishtchev visit the artist Mihailov's studio.

What happens

Anna, Vronsky, and Golenishtchev visit the artist Mihailov's studio. They admire an old study of two boys fishing, which Mihailov had forgotten, and Vronsky decides to buy it. After they leave, Mihailov, initially agitated by their visit, regains his artistic focus and works on his painting of Pilate and Christ, finding deep satisfaction in his own vision.

Themes in this chapter

  • Isolation and Misunderstanding

    Mihailov's profound isolation from his visitors' superficial understanding of art; they discuss 'talent' without grasping the artist's lived agony and ecstasy, while he finds true meaning only when alone with his work.

  • Search for Meaning

    Mihailov's search for artistic perfection and significance in his painting, a conviction that requires intense, exclusive fervor, contrasted with the visitors' commodification of art.

Characters to notice

  • Anna Arkadyevna Karenina

    Visits Mihailov's studio with Vronsky and Golenishtchev, exchanging glances with Vronsky and participating in the artistic critique.

  • Count Alexey Kirillovitch Vronsky

    Leads the visit to Mihailov's studio, asks if the study of the boys is for sale, and resolves to purchase it, discussing art with his companions.

  • Mihailov

    The artist, initially discomfited by his visitors' opinions, forgets his finished work. After they leave, he re-engages with his painting of Pilate and Christ, finding inspiration and correcting details.

  • Golenishtchev

    Accompanies Anna and Vronsky, praises Mihailov's study of the boys with sincere admiration, and participates in the post-visit discussion about talent.

Key passages

  • He had forgotten all the agonies and the ecstasies he had lived through with that picture when for several months it had been the one thought haunting him day and night.

    The artist had completely forgotten the intense emotional and creative struggle that went into the painting, which once consumed his every thought.

    Highlights the transient nature of artistic passion and the disconnect between creation and later reception.

  • They said that there was no denying his talent, but that his talent could not develop for want of education—the common defect of our Russian artists.

    They acknowledged his natural ability but blamed a lack of formal education for stunting its growth, a typical criticism they levied against Russian artists.

    Shows the visitors' condescending, conventional critique, reducing complex artistry to a simple formula.

  • He began to look at his picture with all his own full artist vision, and was soon in that mood of conviction of the perfectibility, and so of the significance, of his picture—a conviction essential to the most intense fervor, excluding all other interests—in which alone he could work.

    Once alone, he viewed his painting through his own artistic lens, entering a state of absolute belief in its perfectibility and meaning—a focused, fervent state necessary for him to create.

    Emphasizes the solitary, deeply personal nature of true artistic inspiration and labor.