# First Essay: 'Good and Evil,' 'Good and Bad' explained — The Genealogy of Morals

> Chapter companion for The Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche.

## What happens

Nietzsche begins his genealogical investigation into the origin of moral values, challenging the assumption that 'good' originates from altruistic actions. He argues that the concept of 'good' was originally coined by the noble, powerful, and high-minded to denote their own qualities, while 'bad' was applied to the low, common, and plebeian. He contrasts this with the 'slave revolt in morality,' led by the Jews and later Christianity, which revalued these terms, turning 'good' into a label for the weak, humble, and suffering, and 'evil' for the powerful and noble. This inversion, driven by ressentiment, creates a new moral framework that Nietzsche critiques as life-denying.

## Themes in this chapter

### Master Morality vs. Slave Morality

Central to the essay: Nietzsche contrasts the original noble morality (good/bad) with the slave morality (good/evil) born from ressentiment.

### Ressentiment and the Revaluation of Values

The slave revolt in morality is driven by ressentiment, leading to a revaluation of aristocratic values into their opposites.

## Character check-ins

### Nietzsche

The author and central voice, conducting a genealogical critique of moral values.

### the Jews

Identified as the initiators of the 'slave revolt in morality,' inverting the aristocratic value equation.

### Dr. Paul Rée

Mentioned as a contemporary whose work on the origin of moral sensations Nietzsche critiques.

### the Greeks

Referenced as an example of a culture where aristocratic value judgments prevailed, with words like 'esthlos' meaning the truthful and noble.

## Key lines

> The judgment 'good' did not originate with those to whom 'goodness' was shown! Rather it was 'the good' themselves, that is to say, the noble, powerful, high-stationed and high-minded, who felt and established themselves and their actions as good.

The concept of 'good' was originally self-defined by the powerful and noble, not by those who received benefits from them.

_Nietzsche's core thesis on the origin of 'good' in aristocratic self-affirmation._

> It was the Jews who, with awe-inspiring consistency, dared to invert the aristocratic value-equation (good = noble = powerful = beautiful = happy = beloved of God) and to hang on to this inversion with their teeth, the teeth of the most abysmal hatred (the hatred of impotence).

The Jews radically reversed the ancient aristocratic value system, equating the poor and weak with the good, and the powerful with evil.

_Key moment identifying the Jewish slave revolt as the origin of the moral inversion._

## Links

- HTML: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/the_genealogy_of_morals_se/chapters/first-essay
- Book: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/the_genealogy_of_morals_se
- All chapters: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/the_genealogy_of_morals_se/chapters