# Mr. Furnival's Speech explained — Orley Farm

> Chapter companion for Orley Farm by Anthony Trollope.

## What happens

Mr. Furnival delivers a powerful three-hour speech in defense of Lady Mason at her trial, passionately arguing her innocence despite knowing she is guilty. He attacks the credibility of witnesses Dockwrath, Kenneby, and Bridget Bolster, and appeals to the jury's sympathy by highlighting Lady Mason's suffering and the presence of her son Lucius and Mrs. Orme by her side. The legal world later finds no fault with his conduct, considering it his duty as a barrister.

## Themes in this chapter

### Truth and Deception

Mr. Furnival knowingly defends a guilty client, presenting her as innocent while attacking truthful witnesses, highlighting the tension between legal duty and moral truth.

### Justice and Injustice

The trial raises questions about the fairness of the legal process, as a guilty woman may be acquitted due to skilled advocacy and the jury's sympathy.

### Reputation and Scandal

Lady Mason's reputation is central to the trial, with Furnival invoking her character and the presence of Mrs. Orme to sway the jury.

## Character check-ins

### Mr. Furnival

Delivers the closing speech for the defense, passionately arguing Lady Mason's innocence despite knowing her guilt.

### Lady Mason

The defendant, who bears the trial with composure while her hand twitches convulsively in Mrs. Orme's.

### Mrs. Orme

Sits by Lady Mason's side throughout the trial, holding her hand and providing comfort.

### Lucius Mason

Lady Mason's son, present in court and turning to his mother with an air of triumph during Furnival's speech.

### Samuel Dockwrath

Accused by Furnival of malice and interested motives, and portrayed as unworthy of credit.

### Mr. Chaffanbrass

Whispers a comment during Furnival's speech, audible throughout the court.

## Key lines

> And yet as he sat down he knew that she had been guilty! To his ear her guilt had never been confessed; but yet he knew that it was so, and, knowing that, he had been able to speak as though her innocence were a thing of course.

Despite knowing Lady Mason was guilty, Mr. Furnival delivered his speech as if her innocence were certain.

_Highlights the moral conflict between Furnival's knowledge and his professional duty._

> But I do hope that that verdict will be accompanied by some expression on your part which may show to the world at large how great has been the wickedness displayed in the accusation.

Furnival asks the jury to not only acquit but also condemn the prosecution's malice.

_Shows Furnival's rhetorical strategy to further discredit the accusers._

> He had not intended to lie when he told the jury that he was not quite sure he had never witnessed two signatures by Sir Joseph Mason on the same day, nor did he lie when he told them again that he had witnessed three.

Furnival argues that Kenneby's contradictory testimony was due to confusion, not dishonesty.

_Illustrates Furnival's tactic of undermining witness credibility without accusing them of perjury._

## Links

- HTML: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/orley_farm_se/chapters/lxxii-mr-furnival-s-speech
- Book: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/orley_farm_se
- All chapters: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/orley_farm_se/chapters