# From Mr. Loscombe to Mrs. Noel Vanstone explained — No Name

> Chapter companion for No Name by Wilkie Collins.

## What happens

Mr. Loscombe writes to Magdalen, acknowledging her refusal of his earlier proposal. He analyzes a clause in Noel Vanstone's will, arguing that the phrase 'to be by him applied to such uses as he may think fit' suggests a secret trust in favor of Admiral Bartram. Loscombe explains the concept of a secret trust and expresses his belief that discovering it could be crucial to Magdalen's interests, though he cannot offer further advice or action until the trust is proven.

## Themes in this chapter

### Inheritance and Law

The chapter centers on legal analysis of Noel Vanstone's will, the possibility of a secret trust, and the implications for Magdalen's inheritance rights.

### Secrecy and Revelation

Loscombe suggests that the will's ambiguous wording conceals a secret trust, and the chapter explores the potential for revealing hidden testamentary intentions.

## Character check-ins

### Magdalen Vanstone

Addressed as Mrs. Noel Vanstone; she has rejected Loscombe's earlier proposal for reasons of her own.

### John Loscombe

The solicitor writing the letter; he provides a detailed legal analysis of the will and the possibility of a secret trust.

### Noel Vanstone

The deceased husband; his will is the subject of Loscombe's analysis.

### Admiral Bartram

The legatee of the residue of Noel Vanstone's estate; Loscombe suspects he holds a secret trust.

## Key lines

> If it had been possible to show that Mr. Vanstone was domiciled in Scotland at the time of his death, we might have asserted your interests by means of the Scotch law, which does not allow a husband the power of absolutely disinheriting his wife.

If Noel Vanstone had been legally considered a resident of Scotland when he died, Scottish law would have prevented him from completely cutting his wife out of the inheritance.

_Loscombe explains a hypothetical legal avenue that was unavailable due to Noel's temporary stay in Scotland._

> I am firmly persuaded that the latter explanation is the right one. The words are expressly intended to mislead some person—yourself in all probability—and the cunning which has put them to that use is a cunning which (as constantly happens when uninstructed persons meddle with law) has overreached itself.

Loscombe believes the odd phrasing in the will was deliberately designed to deceive Magdalen, but the amateurish cunning backfired and actually reveals a hidden trust.

_Loscombe interprets the will's wording as a failed attempt at deception that inadvertently points to a secret trust._

## Links

- HTML: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/no_name_se/chapters/viii-from-mr-loscombe-to-mrs-noel-vanstone
- Book: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/no_name_se
- All chapters: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/no_name_se/chapters