# On Constancy (Or Firmness) explained — Discourses

> Chapter companion for Discourses by Epictetus.

## What happens

Epictetus argues that the essence of good and evil lies in the will, not in external events. He emphasizes that true constancy comes from recognizing that only our own judgments and choices are within our power, while externals like body, property, and reputation are not. He uses examples of Socrates and the Stoic ideal to illustrate how a philosopher should remain unshaken by threats, imprisonment, or death, and should treat the ignorant with patience, like children. The chapter calls for practical application of philosophical principles rather than mere theoretical debate.

## Themes in this chapter

### Dichotomy of Control

Central to the chapter: Epictetus distinguishes between what is in our power (will, opinion) and what is not (body, property, reputation), and insists that good and evil reside only in the former.

### Freedom and Slavery

Explored through the contrast between the runaway slave who fears external masters and the philosopher who, by mastering his own judgments, becomes truly free.

### Philosophy as Practical Discipline

Epictetus criticizes those who merely study logical arguments without applying them in real trials, urging readers to become living examples of Stoic constancy.

## Character check-ins

### Socrates

Cited as the model of firmness and happiness in adversity; he excused his jailor and calmly accepted hemlock, showing that external threats cannot harm the true self.

### Epictetus

The speaker and teacher, who uses his own experience (e.g., losing a lamp to a thief) to illustrate Stoic principles of valuing only what is within one's control.

### Caesar

Mentioned as a symbol of worldly power whose threats (like imprisonment or death) are only over externals, not over the philosopher's will.

### Anytus

Referenced alongside Melitus as one of Socrates' accusers; Epictetus quotes Socrates saying they can kill but not hurt him.

### Melitus

Co-accuser of Socrates, mentioned to illustrate that external force cannot harm the virtuous will.

## Key lines

> The being (nature) of the Good is a certain Will; the being of the Bad is a certain kind of Will. What then are externals? Materials for the Will, about which the will being conversant shall obtain its own good or evil.

Good and evil are not in external things but in our own choices and judgments; externals are merely the raw material that our will uses to achieve either virtue or vice.

_This is the foundational Stoic principle of the dichotomy of control, restated by Epictetus to emphasize that moral value depends entirely on our inner disposition._

> Anytus and Melitus can kill me, but they cannot hurt me: and further, he says, 'If it so pleases God, so let it be.'

Socrates acknowledged that his accusers could end his life, but they could not harm his true self; he accepted whatever fate God ordained.

_Epictetus uses Socrates as the ultimate example of constancy, showing that even death is indifferent to the wise person._

> If you would have anything good, receive it from yourself.

If you want to possess something truly good, you must derive it from your own inner resources, not from external sources.

_This is presented as a divine law: the only reliable source of good is one's own virtuous will._

## Links

- HTML: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/discourses_se/chapters/xxix-on-constancy-or-firmness
- Book: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/discourses_se
- All chapters: https://www.betterreads.online/discover/discourses_se/chapters